Why Breast Cancer is Higher in Black Women
Copyright 2005, James Michael Howard,
In 1994 I first suggested that testosterone may be involved in causing breast cancer (International Journal of Cancer 2005; 115: 497 and Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142: 471-472). For example, smoking increases breast cancer risk (Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Oct;16(8):975-85) and smoking in premenopausal women increases testosterone (Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(4):331-7). Alcohol “is associated with increased breast cancer risk” (Alcohol. 2005 Apr;35(3):213-25) and alcohol increases testosterone levels in premenopausal women (J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 May;86(5):1981-5). “Abdominal fat has been shown to be an important risk factor for …breast cancer.” in premenopausal women (Genet Epidemiol. 2001 May;20(4):458-78) and higher free testosterone has been connected with abdominal fat accumulation (Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 May 15;114(8-9):321-6). Again, I suggest testosterone is involved in breast cancer. The mechanism involves the effect of reduced DHEA on certain genes, as a consequence of reduced conversion of DHEAS to DHEA caused by testosterone. (Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) also reduces DHEA and may be why HRT increases breast cancer.) However, to satisfy the intention of this treatise, I will deal only with testosterone.
While controversial, that is, there is not absolute agreement, most studies find higher levels of testosterone in African-American women compared to European-Americans (black and white). Testosterone was recently reported to be higher in African-American women compared to Caucasian women (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun;14(6):1514-20). I suggest this increased testosterone affects the epidemiology of breast cancer within these two populations.
“African American women have a lower overall
incidence of breast cancer but a higher overall mortality than do white women.
African American women with breast cancer present for medical care at an
earlier age, with more advanced stage disease, and with higher-risk tumor
biology. While the advanced stage at presentation and higher-risk tumor biology
appear to account for much of the excess mortality in African American women,
differences persist even after controlling for these factors. This paper
discusses the factors that may contribute to differences in survival and
differences in stage at diagnosis between African American and white women.”
(Perspect Biol Med. 2005 Winter;48(1 Suppl):S166-75)
As a biologist, I suggest some diseases
produce differential reproduction in some groups by reducing representation
within current populations. Breast
cancer may cause this phenomenon in black women. If black women are more prone to breast
cancer, it is possible that vulnerable black women were adversely affected in
the past before comprehensive epidemiological studies could have found
them. That is, there may have been a
time when black women exhibited more breast cancer incidence than white
women. This may have reduced the
percentage of vulnerable black women at that time. However, when those who are currently
vulnerable develop breast cancer, the increased testosterone may produce much
earlier, more pronounced cancers. The
quotation, above, does report earlier age and more aggressive tumors in black
women who develop breast cancer at this time.
I suggest this supports my interpretation that the population of black
women of today may have been preceded by a population of black women in the
past who developed breast cancer early in their lives and are reduced in the
current population. I suggest this may
be seen in the following quotation.
“RESULTS: Women from sub-Saharan
It is my hypothesis that the "secular trend," the increase in size and earlier puberty of children, is caused by an increase in the percentage of individuals of higher testosterone within populations. This is driven by increases in the percentage of women of higher testosterone. (Some say the trend is due to increased calories; increased calories only increases reproduction of this percentage of the population, not cause it.) It is this increase in percentage of women of higher testosterone that may be the cause of the increase in breast cancer …if increased testosterone is part of the causative mechanism. If I am correct, at some time in the future epidemiology will find a reduction of breast cancer in white women along with an increase in earlier age at onset with more aggressive tumors.
New Supporting
Research:
J
Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar
20;24(9):1342-9.
Meta-analysis of
survival in African American and white American patients with breast cancer:
ethnicity compared with socioeconomic status.
Newman
LA,
PURPOSE: The
extent to which socioeconomic disadvantages and inadequate health care access
account for the disproportionately elevated mortality hazard observed in
African American compared with white American patients with breast cancer is
poorly defined. METHODS: We identified 20 studies reported between January 1980
and June 2005 that provided survival analyses in patients with breast cancer
after adjusting for ethnicity and some measurement of socioeconomic status.
These studies also adjusted for age and stage of disease at time of diagnosis.
RESULTS: The pooled outcome data yielded estimates for the mortality hazard in
14,013 African American and 76,111 white American patients with breast cancer.
Studies varied in their methods for assigning socioeconomic status, with most
relying on area-wide measures such as census tract and census block data. The
combined analysis (adjusted for age, stage, and socioeconomic status) revealed
that African American ethnicity was associated with a statistically significant
excess mortality risk in overall survival (mortality hazard, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.18
to 1.38) and in breast cancer-specific survival (mortality hazard, 1.19; 95%
CI, 1.10 to 1.29). CONCLUSION: Our pooled analysis demonstrated that African
American ethnicity is a significant and independent predictor of poor outcome
from breast cancer, even after accounting for socioeconomic status by
conventional measures. These findings support the need for further investigation
of the biologic, genetic, and sociocultural factors that may influence survival
in African American patients with breast cancer.
JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2492-502.
Race, breast
cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.
Carey LA, Perou
CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, Karaca G, Troester MA, Tse CK,
Edmiston S, Deming SL, Geradts J, Cheang MC, Nielsen TO, Moorman PG, Earp HS,
Millikan RC.
Division of
Hematology/Oncology, School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology,
University of North Carolina-Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel
Hill, NC 27599-7305, USA.
CONTEXT: Gene
expression analysis has identified several breast cancer subtypes, including
basal-like, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive/estrogen receptor
negative (HER2+/ER-), luminal A, and luminal B. OBJECTIVES: To determine
population-based distributions and clinical associations for breast cancer
subtypes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Immunohistochemical surrogates for
each subtype were applied to 496 incident cases of invasive breast cancer from
the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (ascertained between May 1993 and December
1996), a population-based, case-control study that oversampled premenopausal
and African American women. Subtype definitions were as follows: luminal A (ER+
and/or progesterone receptor positive [PR+], HER2-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+,
HER2+), basal-like (ER-, PR-, HER2-, cytokeratin 5/6 positive, and/or HER1+),
HER2+/ER- (ER-, PR-, and HER2+), and unclassified (negative for all 5 markers).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We examined the prevalence of breast cancer subtypes
within racial and menopausal subsets and determined their associations with
tumor size, axillary nodal status, mitotic index, nuclear pleomorphism,
combined grade, p53 mutation status, and breast cancer-specific survival.
RESULTS: The basal-like breast cancer subtype was more prevalent among
premenopausal African American women (39%) compared with postmenopausal African
American women (14%) and non-African American women (16%) of any age
(P<.001), whereas the luminal A subtype was less prevalent (36% vs 59% and
54%, respectively). The HER2+/ER- subtype did not vary with race or menopausal
status (6%-9%). Compared with luminal A, basal-like tumors had more TP53
mutations (44% vs 15%, P<.001), higher mitotic index (odds ratio [OR], 11.0;
95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-21.7), more marked nuclear pleomorphism (OR,
9.7; 95% CI, 5.3-18.0), and higher combined grade (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 4.4-15.6).
Breast cancer-specific survival differed by subtype (P<.001), with shortest
survival among HER2+/ER- and basal-like subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Basal-like breast
tumors occurred at a higher prevalence among premenopausal African American
patients compared with postmenopausal African American and non-African American
patients in this population-based study. A higher prevalence of basal-like
breast tumors and a lower prevalence of luminal A
tumors could contribute to the poor prognosis of young African American women
with breast cancer.